| From: | Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Xavier ZIMMERMANN <xzimmermann(at)matra-ms2i(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] 8Ko limitation |
| Date: | 2000-07-20 08:00:17 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.3.96.1000720095417.11997B-100000@ara.zf.jcu.cz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
> what about performances with postgreSQL and large databases,
> the object size limitation (8192 bytes) is really not acceptable for this
Now you can change this limit in config.h, the possible range is
8Kb - 32Kb.
In new 7.1 version will this limit dead forever (see TOAST project).
And what is a "large database"? 1, 5 .. 10Gb? If yes, (IMHO) the PostgreSQL
is good choice.
Karel
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephane Bortzmeyer | 2000-07-20 08:35:41 | Re: Re: [HACKERS] 8Ko limitation |
| Previous Message | Oliver Elphick | 2000-07-20 07:53:30 | Re: unique constraint - bug? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephane Bortzmeyer | 2000-07-20 08:35:41 | Re: Re: [HACKERS] 8Ko limitation |
| Previous Message | Oliver Elphick | 2000-07-20 07:53:27 | Re: Shared library search paths |