Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE

From: Karel Zak - Zakkr <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE
Date: 2000-03-02 15:16:17
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.3.96.1000302161415.3304D-100000@ara.zf.jcu.cz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Thu, 2 Mar 2000, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> On Wed, 1 Mar 2000, Karel Zak - Zakkr wrote:
>
> > Yes. Just today I look at Oracle's documentation for ROLEs, PROFILEs
> > ... my idea is prepare acl/account code for this freatures too. What?
>
> I read about that in SQL3 yesterday and I think we could transparently
> adapt the current group scheme to it.

Sorry, I skip this part in my previous letter. Why you mean adaptation
to current group scheme?

Karel

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-03-02 15:20:26 Re: [HACKERS] bitten by docs
Previous Message Karel Zak - Zakkr 2000-03-02 15:12:41 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE