Re: [HACKERS] Re: [DOCS] Last call?

From: Terry Mackintosh <terry(at)terrym(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL-development <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [DOCS] Last call?
Date: 1998-10-25 18:26:45
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.3.95.981025132434.32693B-100000@terry1.acun.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Tom

Nope, RH4.2/libc5, same as you.
Still waiting for the dust to settle on the glibc thing:)

On Sun, 25 Oct 1998, Thomas G. Lockhart wrote:

> > > 'Linux ix86' had an '_', or unknown
> > Thanks Terry, but I've already got that one done
>
> But Oliver was asking about glibc2 vs libc5. Do you happen to have a
> glibc machine (RH 5.x?) available? If so we could use a direct report of
> success since I'm still running RH4.2/libc5 for development...
>
> - Tom

Terry Mackintosh <terry(at)terrym(dot)com> http://www.terrym.com
sysadmin/owner Please! No MIME encoded or HTML mail, unless needed.

Proudly powered by R H Linux 4.2, Apache 1.3, PHP 3, PostgreSQL 6.3
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Success Is A Choice ... book by Rick Patino, get it, read it!

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Egon Schmid 1998-10-25 18:26:51 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [DOCS] Last call?
Previous Message Egon Schmid 1998-10-25 18:19:39 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [DOCS] Last call?