Re: [HACKERS] grant still broken

From: James Hughes <jamesh(at)interpath(dot)com>
To: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: Peter T Mount <psqlhack(at)maidast(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] grant still broken
Date: 1998-01-14 15:34:47
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.3.93.980114102718.22348A-100000@xport.bluewall.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 14 Jan 1998, Thomas G. Lockhart wrote:

> > > > > Well, I've rebuilt postgres again, using a fresh cvs snapshot, and grant
> > > > > is still broken.
> > > >
> > > > I see the same behavior here, so it's not just you :)
> > >
> > > Tom, what platform are you running it on? It seems the others have no
> > > problems with BSD.
> > >
> > > I'm using Linux.
> >
> > I'm running Linux and I'm getting the current cvs tree now. I will try to
> > reproduce the problem on my system and track it down.
> >
> > I am still running 6.2.0. Anything I need to watch out for when running
> > the latest?
>
> Just watch out for better performance :)
>
> Oh, there is a problem with varchar() at the moment.
>

I've (quickly) compiled and installed this mornings cvs and am getting some
odd behavior. I have a death in the family, so I'm not going to be able to
sort it all out before this weekend.

I get segfaults and authentication problems when trying to run perl scripts.
Also, I'm not sure I have a handle on the new acl stuff.

`Anyways', hopefully I can get everything worked out and compile a debug
version to poke through with gdb this weekend.

-James

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 1998-01-14 15:59:23 Re: [CORE] Something...interesting...
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-01-14 15:33:45 Re: [BUGS] General Bug Report: palloc fails with lots of ANDs and ORs