Re: [HACKERS] make install fails in perl5 ...

From: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] make install fails in perl5 ...
Date: 1998-10-27 16:47:55
Message-ID: Pine.HPP.3.94.981027114335.21026B-100000@cinnamon.michvhf.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 27 Oct 1998, Tom Lane wrote:

> The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> > So, who took the root check out, and when, and why?
>
> Well, I didn't do it, but I agree with whoever took it out. You cannot
> test at *configure* time to see whether the invoker of configure is
> root. It is not reasonable to expect people to do the configure and
> build as root, even if they su to root for the install step (which
> is surely the WRONG thing for a Postgres install anyway!)

Hmmm. That's how I do it, although it *is* a PITA to chown everything
to do the regression tests. It just seems odd to have one package
install this way when all the other packages I install are done from
root.

Vince.
--
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev(at)michvhf(dot)com flame-mail: /dev/null
# include <std/disclaimers.h> TEAM-OS2
Online Searchable Campground Listings http://www.camping-usa.com
"There is no outfit less entitled to lecture me about bloat
than the federal government" -- Tony Snow
==========================================================================

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1998-10-27 16:49:07 Re: [HACKERS] Re: AWL: PostgreSQL ODBC.
Previous Message Tom Lane 1998-10-27 16:39:19 Re: [HACKERS] Last call?