Re: 8.3RC2 vs 8.2.6 testing results

From: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
To: PG-General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 8.3RC2 vs 8.2.6 testing results
Date: 2008-01-29 05:24:29
Message-ID: Pine.GSO.4.64.0801290020100.20361@westnet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Tom Lane wrote:

> I speculate that you're noticing the slightly slower/more complicated
> hash function that 8.3 uses for integers.

There was a similar slowdown in the Clodaldo case you tracked down
recently. Is it worth considering an addition to the release notes
warning about this class of problem? If there have been two of them so
far just in the beta I wonder how many people are going to run into some
variant of this in the future.

--
* Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marko Kreen 2008-01-29 07:45:04 Re: 8.3RC2 vs 8.2.6 testing results
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-01-29 03:13:28 Re: 8.3RC2 vs 8.2.6 testing results