Re: Data on NAS / NFS

From: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
To: Jean-Denis Girard <jd(dot)girard(at)sysnux(dot)pf>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Data on NAS / NFS
Date: 2007-07-28 18:54:24
Message-ID: Pine.GSO.4.64.0707281438560.6865@westnet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, 27 Jul 2007, Jean-Denis Girard wrote:

> The NAS would be from LaCie, using 4 disks (Raid5 + spare)
> (http://www.lacie.com/fr/products/product.htm?pid=10876), mounted via NFS
> from a Linux server running Postgresql .

Leaving aside the general issue here for others to chime in on (my opinion
is that putting a PostgreSQL database on this class of network storage
would be crazy but I have no hard data to support that), I would strongly
recommend against any of LaCie's products in this area. The company got a
decent reputation based on their early Mac Firewire products, but it's
been a number of years since they released any product that I would
consider worth storing even a byte of data on. Their designs are buggy
from day one, the reliability is awful, and the issues stem from their
bridge chipsets.

It took me only seconds to find a sample page with multiple anecdotal
samples on this subject:

http://reviews.pricegrabber.com/hard-drives/m/11165851/

The problems with their products are so widespread I'm sure it would be
easy for you to find many more if you search around a bit.

--
* Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2007-07-29 13:37:57 Re: European users mailing list
Previous Message Oleg Bartunov 2007-07-28 18:43:44 Re: tsearch2 problems in postgres?