Re: Got no response last time on setsockopt post, so I thought I would reiterate.

From: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
To: Dann Corbit <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Got no response last time on setsockopt post, so I thought I would reiterate.
Date: 2007-06-11 23:09:18
Message-ID: Pine.GSO.4.64.0706111906170.12855@westnet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Dann Corbit wrote:

> These two calls make our remote queries via libpq about twice as fast on
> average.

Can you comment a bit on what your remote queries are typically doing?
You'll need to provide at least an idea what type of test case you're
seeing the improvement on for others to try and replicate it.

--
* Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dann Corbit 2007-06-11 23:18:32 Re: Got no response last time on setsockopt post, so I thought I would reiterate.
Previous Message Angelo 2007-06-11 22:59:07 Re: Schema as versioning strategy