Re: SCSI vs SATA

From: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SCSI vs SATA
Date: 2007-04-06 06:10:11
Message-ID: Pine.GSO.4.64.0704060205580.15433@westnet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Tom Lane wrote:

> It seems hard to believe that the vendors themselves wouldn't burn in
> the drives for half a day, if that's all it takes to eliminate a large
> fraction of infant mortality.

I've read that much of the damage that causes hard drive infant mortality
is related to shipping. The drive is fine when it leaves the factory,
gets shaken up and otherwise brutalized by environmental changes in
transit (it's a long trip from Singapore to here), and therefore is a bit
whacked by the time it is installed. A quick post-installation burn-in
helps ferret out when this happens.

--
* Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-04-06 06:23:56 Re: Premature view materialization in 8.2?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-04-06 06:00:15 Re: SCSI vs SATA