From: | Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> |
---|---|
To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Subtle pg_dump problem... |
Date: | 2004-05-12 15:28:28 |
Message-ID: | Pine.GSO.4.58.0405121924330.9525@ra.sai.msu.su |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 12 May 2004, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > No problem,
>
> Actually, I did some more testing and I properly understand the problem
> now - and it won't happen in the general restoring case.
>
> What fails is if you "pg_dump -a" to just dump the DATA from a table
> containing a tsearch2 trigger that is in a different schema.
>
> Then you delete all the rows from the table.
>
> Then you try to execute the sql script created from pg_dump to restore
> the data.
>
> It will fail because the sql script will automatically set the
> search_path to public, pg_catalog. And then as the COPY command inserts
> each row, it will fail immediately as the tsearch2 trigger will not be
> able to find its config table.
>
> Does that make sense?
Hmm, what other hackers thinks ? This is not just a tsearch2 problem,
it could happens with any such kind of things, like defining user defined
type in one scheme, using it in another, dumping separate data.
Could pg_dump be enough smart to set search_path properly ?
>
> Chris
>
Regards,
Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet,
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia)
Internet: oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-05-12 15:57:10 | Re: threads stuff/UnixWare |
Previous Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2004-05-12 15:22:17 | Re: Subtle pg_dump problem... |