Re: with vs without oids in pg_catalog.*

From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: with vs without oids in pg_catalog.*
Date: 2004-04-01 13:47:16
Message-ID: Pine.GSO.4.58.0404011446090.29898@elvis
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Dear Tom,

> > So my question still is: Given the fact that I have some use for these
> > oids, would it make sense to submit a patch to add them?
>
> It will be rejected.

That's a simple a direct answer as I like them.
So I won't bother to submit a patch;-)

BTW, maybe you could reject some of the patches I submitted earlier,
rather than to simply ignore them?

> We removed pg_attribute OIDs some time ago, and we aren't going to put
> them back without a much better reason than this. If you need a
> specific counterargument, here is one: pg_attribute is normally much the
> largest catalog. If we required its rows to have unique OIDs, the
> probability of collisions after OID-counter wraparound would be much
> greater than it is in other catalogs.

Mmh. Maybe you could have considered sequences.

--
Fabien Coelho - coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-04-01 13:52:03 Re: with vs without oids in pg_catalog.*
Previous Message Manfred Koizar 2004-04-01 10:22:58 Re: Large DB