| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: with vs without oids in pg_catalog.* |
| Date: | 2004-04-01 13:52:03 |
| Message-ID: | 200404011352.i31Dq3H02376@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Fabien COELHO wrote:
>
> Dear Tom,
>
> > > So my question still is: Given the fact that I have some use for these
> > > oids, would it make sense to submit a patch to add them?
> >
> > It will be rejected.
>
> That's a simple a direct answer as I like them.
> So I won't bother to submit a patch;-)
>
> BTW, maybe you could reject some of the patches I submitted earlier,
> rather than to simply ignore them?
The only outstanding patch I see from you is:
[PATCHES] [NOT] (LIKE|ILIKE) (ANY|SOME|ALL) (subquery...)
from March 29. I will put it in the queue now. Are there others we
missed?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fabien COELHO | 2004-04-01 14:16:08 | Re: with vs without oids in pg_catalog.* |
| Previous Message | Fabien COELHO | 2004-04-01 13:47:16 | Re: with vs without oids in pg_catalog.* |