Re: tsearch comments

From: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
To: sector119(at)mail(dot)ru
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)stack(dot)net>
Subject: Re: tsearch comments
Date: 2003-01-28 10:47:04
Message-ID: Pine.GSO.4.44.0301281337110.20835-100000@ra.sai.msu.su
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, 28 Jan 2003 sector119(at)mail(dot)ru wrote:

> HI
>
> will we see sort by relevance at tsearch alpha version? :)
>

not sure. We concentrate our efforts, well, Teodor is working on
better configurability of tsearch like OpenFTS does.

It's not difficult to add rather naive relevance based on position
of lexem in document, for example. The question is do you like such
kind of relevancy ? Real ranking support (as in OpenFTS) require
separate tables to maintain coordinate information.
We want to keep tsearch as simple as it's and now we just add
better and friendly configurability. Do we need complicate tsearch ?
We already have OpenFTS which has most features people requested.

Regards,
Oleg

>

Regards,
Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet,
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia)
Internet: oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gordan Bobic 2003-01-28 11:32:57 Re: list server problems?
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2003-01-28 10:39:03 Re: A powerful dump utility