Re: PostgreSql and Caldera

From: Tod McQuillin <devin(at)spamcop(dot)net>
To: R Talbot <rjtalbo(at)attglobal(dot)net>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSql and Caldera
Date: 2001-05-19 03:50:50
Message-ID: Pine.GSO.4.33.0105182246550.3446-100000@sysadmin
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, 18 May 2001, R Talbot wrote:

> Why does there exist a binary rpm for Caldera eServer
> 2.3 but not for
> Caldera 2.3 edesktop or 2.4 edesktop. I want to install
> on edesktop.
> What are the differences and problems.
> I had read on the PostgreSQL site not to install eserver
> rpm on the
> edesktop,
> "as there are differences"
> I called Caldera Tech they say "I dunno..."
> I called GreatBridge and they say "I dunno.."
> Well I dunno either..
> I would greatly appreciate if someone would
> articulate.. ; > )

My philosophy is, if you have any doubt at all just compile from source.
It does take a little longer, but you're guaranteed to get the right
binary for your system at the end.

You can find step by step instructions at
http://www.postgresql.org/idocs/index.php?installation.html
--
Tod McQuillin

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-05-19 03:54:47 Re: Inserts using plpgsql - Further
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-05-19 03:37:51 Re: Size of Postgres Transaction Logs