From: | Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> |
---|---|
To: | Jeff Hoffmann <jeff(at)propertykey(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: RTREE on points |
Date: | 2001-04-17 21:18:14 |
Message-ID: | Pine.GSO.4.33.0104180014220.13885-100000@ra.sai.msu.su |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Jeff Hoffmann wrote:
> Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> >
> > GiST is great !
> >
> > You may look at http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/postgres/gist/
> > for GiST implementation of RTree - it could be not compiled with 7.1
> > release due to some api changes, but it's not difficult to do.
>
> it looks like i just wasted a good couple of hours trying to convert the
> gist_box_ops. it did help find the pointer problem i was having because
> i'm still not up to speed on the new function calling conventions,
> though...
>
:-)
> > If somebody want it I could contribute it to contrib area.
>
> i'm definitely interested. i'm going to play with it & if oleg's claim
> holds about index insertion time holds, i can definitely see myself
> moving to it over the built in rtree. anything that can cut down the
> hours of index creation time would be great. also, it seems that it'd
> be a good choice for inclusion in the standard distribution because it'd
> be easy to test -- you already have to run rtree tests anyway, you can
> just duplicate them with gist & gist_box_ops.
>
nice you noticed that ! We'll update contrib-rtree_box_gist for 7.1 release
in a few days.
>
Regards,
Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet,
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia)
Internet: oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nils Zonneveld | 2001-04-17 22:25:31 | Re: Same question about PostgreSql |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-04-17 20:48:55 | Re: is this proper sql? |