Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server

From: <mkscott(at)sacadia(dot)com>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Haroldo Stenger <hstenger(at)adinet(dot)com(dot)uy>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server
Date: 2002-02-08 07:14:01
Message-ID: Pine.GSO.4.10.10202072311060.3692-100000@goldengate.kojoworldwide.com.
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:

>
> Would be willing to take what you've learnt and work with the current CVS
> tree towards making her thread-safe? Even small steps regularly taken
> brings us closer to being able to use even *some* threading in the backend
> ...
>

I can definitely take a stab aat it. Maybe I can make a test case with
some globals that are accessed often submit some patches to see what
people think. Can I send them to you?

Myron
mkscott(at)sacadia(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Gould 2002-02-08 08:02:36 Re: 7.2 - changed array_out() - quotes vs no quotes
Previous Message Lamar Owen 2002-02-08 06:35:40 Re: Why dump/restore to upgrade?