Re: Subject: Re: [GENERAL] A book for PgSQL? A need? yes? no?

From: Stephan Doliov <statsol(at)statsol(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Subject: Re: [GENERAL] A book for PgSQL? A need? yes? no?
Date: 1999-02-13 17:33:51
Message-ID: Pine.GSO.4.05.9902131229050.21805-100000@iguana
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, 12 Feb 1999, Rudy Gireyev wrote:

> So if I'm reading this correctly, the book idea is dead. Right?

hardly. i think gene was being a little bit playful and i tried to point
out, as others have, the substantial point, which was acquiring mindshare
through the presence of an O'Reilly book. I think it's worth doing,
especially if it is well planned and a first release would coincide with a
release of postgres that has the few features/standards it is presently
missing -- sort of an postgres has truly arrived party (much the way linux
has gained mindshare credibility among non hacker types in the past 18
months).

steve

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ralli 1999-02-13 17:54:21 unsubscribe
Previous Message Michael Davis 1999-02-13 07:14:03