Re: [HACKERS] createdb default arguments

From: Peter Eisentraut <e99re41(at)DoCS(dot)UU(dot)SE>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] createdb default arguments
Date: 2000-02-10 16:08:14
Message-ID: Pine.GSO.4.02A.10002101706420.19049-100000@Zebra.DoCS.UU.SE
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, Thomas Lockhart wrote:

> createdb has lost its ability to supply a default database name, and
> now *requires* an argument to run. Did we make this change because it
> was difficult or impossible to get the default argument on some of our
> supported platforms? Or did we make the change because it is "more
> correct" or something?

What was supposed to be the default argument?

>
> I'm finding it annoying to retrain my fingers to type more stuff to
> get the same functionality as before ;)

Can be fixed. Probably something that happened during the massive rewrite
phase.

--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders vaeg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-02-10 16:12:54 Re: [HACKERS] psql and libpq fixes
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-02-10 16:06:22 Re: [HACKERS] psql and libpq fixes