From: | Peter Eisentraut <e99re41(at)DoCS(dot)UU(dot)SE> |
---|---|
To: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
Cc: | Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] createdb default arguments |
Date: | 2000-02-10 16:08:14 |
Message-ID: | Pine.GSO.4.02A.10002101706420.19049-100000@Zebra.DoCS.UU.SE |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> createdb has lost its ability to supply a default database name, and
> now *requires* an argument to run. Did we make this change because it
> was difficult or impossible to get the default argument on some of our
> supported platforms? Or did we make the change because it is "more
> correct" or something?
What was supposed to be the default argument?
>
> I'm finding it annoying to retrain my fingers to type more stuff to
> get the same functionality as before ;)
Can be fixed. Probably something that happened during the massive rewrite
phase.
--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders vaeg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-02-10 16:12:54 | Re: [HACKERS] psql and libpq fixes |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-02-10 16:06:22 | Re: [HACKERS] psql and libpq fixes |