| From: | Peter Eisentraut <e99re41(at)DoCS(dot)UU(dot)SE> |
|---|---|
| To: | Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping |
| Date: | 2000-01-25 10:41:55 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.GSO.4.02A.10001251139220.11899-100000@Val.DoCS.UU.SE |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Don Baccus wrote:
> Dropping constraints on a table just because you drop a column is
> just butt-ugly.
Hey, nobody said that this was the final version. Keeping the constraints
was a trivial step from what there was. I guess the lesson I learned was
that around here you Release Late, Release Rarely, and that's fine, but I
didn't know that. Sorry. -> next time ;)
--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders vaeg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-01-25 10:55:23 | Happy column adding (was RE: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping) |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-01-25 10:38:26 | Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping |