| From: | Peter Eisentraut <e99re41(at)DoCS(dot)UU(dot)SE> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | A notice for too long names |
| Date: | 2000-01-20 13:26:44 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.GSO.4.02A.10001201418540.15489-100000@Puma.DoCS.UU.SE |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Wouldn't it be fair if a notice was generated if you attempt to create
and/or reference a name that's longer than NAMEDATALEN. Like
=> create table some_really_much_too_long_name_here ( ... );
NOTICE: "some_really_much_too_long_name_here" will be truncated to
"some_really_much_too_long_name_" [ <possible reference to documentation
and/or source code to change this> ]
Better than finding out after the fact, ISTM. I could (try to) take care
of this.
--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders vaeg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zeugswetter Andreas SB | 2000-01-20 13:39:59 | AW: AW: [HACKERS] initdb problems on Solaris |
| Previous Message | J. Roeleveld | 2000-01-20 12:36:27 | Permissions, update acts same as delete, feature or bug? |