Re: patch adding new regexp functions

From: Jeremy Drake <pgsql(at)jdrake(dot)com>
To: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Mark Dilger <pgsql(at)markdilger(dot)com>
Subject: Re: patch adding new regexp functions
Date: 2007-03-22 05:17:03
Message-ID: Pine.BSO.4.64.0703212215250.19070@resin.csoft.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Wed, 21 Mar 2007, Gregory Stark wrote:

> The only thing I would say is that this should maybe be a TextGetDatum() just
> for code hygiene. It should be exactly equivalent though:

I could not find such a thing using ctags, nor TextPGetDatum(). I looked
at PG_RETURN_TEXT_P and it just uses PG_RETURN_POINTER, which in turn uses
PointerGetDatum. If there is such a thing, it is well camoflaged...

--
If you think the problem is bad now, just wait until we've solved it.
-- Arthur Kasspe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeremy Drake 2007-03-22 05:21:28 Re: patch adding new regexp functions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-03-22 05:15:39 Re: Proposal: Adding JIS X 0213 support

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeremy Drake 2007-03-22 05:21:28 Re: patch adding new regexp functions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-03-22 04:42:23 Re: patch adding new regexp functions