On Sat, 28 Oct 2006, Julien Patrouix wrote:
> In my opinion, improvements could be made in the encoding/decoding of the
> protocole messages (Ie the PGStream class).
> From what I have seen thanks to a profiler some methods are over invoked, and
> the numeric encoding is not as efficient as it could be.
> That numeric encoding/decoding is used very often, even for the protocole
> purposes, not only for data encoding.
> Furthermore, it would be interesting not to use the java BufferedStream
> implementation, and use a specific one so as to directly manage and access
> the buffer.
This is what Mikko Tiihonen has done here and I intend to apply it next
> I use a driver I have optimized, and submitted these obervations a couple of
> time to the list, but I'm really sorry I can't contribute more for a long
> time I'm afraid
I've never seen a patch come across this list. Could you retry or point
me to an archives entry?
In response to
pgsql-jdbc by date
|Next:||From: Kris Jurka||Date: 2006-10-29 02:50:59|
|Subject: Re: JDBC CTS failures|
|Previous:||From: Kris Jurka||Date: 2006-10-29 02:19:12|
|Subject: Re: Prepared statement vs. parameterized|