On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, Andy Zeneski wrote:
> We are talking about concurrency right, not scroll type. The problem
> will be not when the result set is scrollable, but rather then the
> concurrency is updatable. Is this correct? If so, I have this fixed, I
> am adding some test cases now and will send over a new patch.
Right, well it's both because you can have a forward only updateable
resultset use a cursor because it never has to refetch, but the scrollable
case causes problems.
Kris Jurka