Re: Questions about Synonyms - Again

From: Alex Pilosov <alex(at)pilosoft(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Colin Taylor <Colin_Taylor(at)PortaSystemsDev(dot)com>, "'Peter Eisentraut'" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Pgsql Mailing List (E-mail)" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Questions about Synonyms - Again
Date: 2001-01-19 17:00:30
Message-ID: Pine.BSO.4.10.10101191159510.32250-100000@spider.pilosoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

I think this should wait till proper schema support is implemented.

Most frequent use of synonym is to create a public alias to a object in a
private schema.

-alex
On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:

>
> Do we want to add this to the TODO list?
>
> [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> > I am comparing it to Oracle's public synonyms, where you can use different
> > names for things.
> > For example, table "THIS_IS_A_VERY_BYG_NAME" could be accessed using a
> > smaller name, example "TIAVBN".
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net]
> > > Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 3:56 PM
> > > To: Colin Taylor
> > > Cc: Pgsql Mailing List (E-mail)
> > > Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Questions about Synonyms - Again
> > >
> > >
> > > Colin Taylor writes:
> > >
> > > > Are Synonyms supported on Postgresql?
> > >
> > > There is nothing in PostgreSQL that's called a "synonym" per
> > > se, so you
> > > have to describe what you mean by it.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/
> > >
> >
>
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Konstantinos Agouros 2001-01-19 17:11:04 Performance-Tuning
Previous Message Gianpaolo Racca 2001-01-19 16:55:19 Re: Selects with Array member