Re: [SQL] Primary keys: can they be alphanumerical?

From: "Brett W(dot) McCoy" <bmccoy(at)lan2wan(dot)com>
To: Stuart Rison <stuart(at)ludwig(dot)ucl(dot)ac(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [SQL] Primary keys: can they be alphanumerical?
Date: 1998-07-06 13:25:33
Message-ID: Pine.BSI.3.91.980706092124.19636B-100000@access1.lan2wan.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

On Mon, 6 Jul 1998, Stuart Rison wrote:

> I would like to know what is the general concensus on having alphanumerical
> primary keys.

I use alphanumeric primary keys all the time. I keep large databases
with FDA regulatory information in them, and the FDA assigned approval
number, usually a letter, followed by two digits indicating the year of
approval or the type of approval (like for a generic drug), followed by four
digits indicating the sequence of apporval for that year. I use this
same key as a a foreign key for, say, patent records, which is usuallu a
one-to-many join.

Brett W. McCoy
http://www.lan2wan.com/~bmccoy
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
"The Number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected."
-- The UNIX Programmer's Manual, 2nd Edition, June, 1972

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Herouth Maoz 1998-07-06 13:38:53 Re: [SQL] Primary keys: can they be alphanumerical?
Previous Message Stuart Rison 1998-07-06 12:53:36 How to split very long tables?