From: | Jeff <threshar(at)torgo(dot)978(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Sun performance - Major discovery! |
Date: | 2003-10-08 18:45:49 |
Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.44.0310081444370.65018-100000@torgo.978.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Neil Conway wrote:
> ISTM the most legitimate reason for not enabling compilater
> optimizations on a given compiler/OS/architecture combination is might
> cause compiler errors / bad code generation.
>
> Can we get these optimizations enabled in time for the next 7.4 beta? It
> might also be good to add an item in the release notes about it.
>
> -Neil
>
I just ran make check for sun with gcc -O2 and suncc -fast and both
passed.
We'll need other arguments to suncc to supress some warnings, etc. (-fast
generates a warning for every file compiled telling you it will only
run on ultrasparc machines)
--
Jeff Trout <jeff(at)jefftrout(dot)com>
http://www.jefftrout.com/
http://www.stuarthamm.net/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-10-08 18:50:24 | Re: [PERFORM] Sun performance - Major discovery! |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2003-10-08 18:37:31 | Re: Sun performance - Major discovery! |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Conway | 2003-10-08 18:46:44 | Re: Presentation |
Previous Message | Greg Spiegelberg | 2003-10-08 18:39:54 | Re: Compare rows |