Re: [HACKERS] Sun performance - Major discovery!

From: Jeff <threshar(at)torgo(dot)978(dot)org>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Sun performance - Major discovery!
Date: 2003-10-08 18:45:49
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.44.0310081444370.65018-100000@torgo.978.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Neil Conway wrote:

> ISTM the most legitimate reason for not enabling compilater
> optimizations on a given compiler/OS/architecture combination is might
> cause compiler errors / bad code generation.
>
> Can we get these optimizations enabled in time for the next 7.4 beta? It
> might also be good to add an item in the release notes about it.
>
> -Neil
>

I just ran make check for sun with gcc -O2 and suncc -fast and both
passed.

We'll need other arguments to suncc to supress some warnings, etc. (-fast
generates a warning for every file compiled telling you it will only
run on ultrasparc machines)

--
Jeff Trout <jeff(at)jefftrout(dot)com>
http://www.jefftrout.com/
http://www.stuarthamm.net/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-10-08 18:50:24 Re: [PERFORM] Sun performance - Major discovery!
Previous Message Neil Conway 2003-10-08 18:37:31 Re: Sun performance - Major discovery!

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2003-10-08 18:46:44 Re: Presentation
Previous Message Greg Spiegelberg 2003-10-08 18:39:54 Re: Compare rows