Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?

From: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
To: mlw <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?
Date: 2003-01-07 22:46:49
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.44.0301071743470.37989-100000@paprika.michvhf.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, mlw wrote:

> This is a serious inquiry, very serious. People are complaining about ads.
>
> What do we need in the form of equipment, bandwidth, etc.

FTP is just over 800MB, plan for growth.
WEB is just over 90MB, can't tell you what to plan for there.

On www/ftp.us I don't even notice the bandwidth, it's less than the normal
traffic for Pop4 (an ISP) and the streaming audio uses up even more than
that.

Vince.
--
Fast, inexpensive internet service 56k and beyond! http://www.pop4.net/
http://www.meanstreamradio.com http://www.unknown-artists.com
Internet radio: It's not file sharing, it's just radio.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Copeland 2003-01-07 23:02:17 Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?
Previous Message Jean-Luc Lachance 2003-01-07 22:42:45 Re: [HACKERS] I feel the need for speed. What am I doing