Re: refusing connections based on load ...

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: refusing connections based on load ...
Date: 2001-04-26 11:35:13
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.33.0104260833500.4451-100000@mobile.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Vince Vielhaber wrote:

> On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> > >
> > > > The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> > > > > Autoconf has a 'LOADAVG' check already, so what is so problematic about
> > > > > using that to enabled/disable that feature?
> > > >
> > > > Because it's tied to a GNU getloadavg.c implementation, which we'd have
> > > > license problems with using.
> > >
> > > It's part of the standard C library in FreeBSD. Any other platforms
> > > have it built in?
> >
> > As has been mentioned, Solaris and Linux also have it ...
>
> But what's in FreeBSD's standard library isn't GNU.

Wouldn't matter if it was, its part of the OSs standard library ... unless
you mean to pull it in and use it with the distribution, which I think
might be a bad idea ... if we pull anything in, sendmail's would be best
... FreeBSD's will have had anything required for non-FreeBSD systems
yanked out, if it was ever there, while sendmail's already has all the
'hooks' in it ...

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vince Vielhaber 2001-04-26 11:55:57 Re: refusing connections based on load ...
Previous Message Vince Vielhaber 2001-04-26 09:37:40 Re: refusing connections based on load ...