Re: xlog patches reviewed

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>, "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: xlog patches reviewed
Date: 2001-03-13 02:29:26
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.33.0103122229060.3642-100000@mobile.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Tom Lane wrote:

> >> if this is the case, can we look at applying that patch
> >> tonight, give ppl till Friday to test and put out a RC1
> >> depending on the results?
>
> Patch committed. There are still some loose ends to clean up:
>
> * I need to finish making an xlog-reset utility for contrib.
>
> * I stubbed out shmctl(IPC_STAT) in the BeOS and QNX4 emulations of
> SysV shared memory (src/backend/port/beos/shm.c,
> src/backend/port/qnx4/shm.c). This means that the new code to detect
> postmaster-dead-but-old-backends-still-running will never detect any
> problem on those platforms. Perhaps people who use those platforms
> can test and contribute real implementations?
>
> However, these shouldn't affect testing.

Great, then let's go with a RC1 on Friday and see if we can get 7.1 out in
'02 :)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2001-03-13 02:46:11 Re: Internationalized dates (was Internationalized error messages)
Previous Message Philip Warner 2001-03-13 02:22:37 Re: Performance monitor signal handler