Re: Yet another Performance Question

From: Patrik Kudo <kudo(at)partitur(dot)se>
To: Konstantinos Agouros <elwood(at)agouros(dot)de>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Yet another Performance Question
Date: 2001-04-18 12:59:53
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.31.0104181457390.54649-100000@tb303.partitur.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi!

I'm not 100% sure, but I think it would be much faster if you use COPY
instead of INSERT when you read in a lot of data from a file.

Regards,
Patrik Kudo

--
ech`echo xiun|tr nu oc|sed 'sx\([sx]\)\([xoi]\)xo un\2\1 is xg'`ol
Känns det oklart? Fråga på!

On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Konstantinos Agouros wrote:

> Frankly what matters is the time it takes alltogether. I have a script that
> first does a few million inserts, and than queries on this data... these queries
> don't terminate in a reasonable (<10days) time, if I don't use indices.
>
> So I will add some drop/create index-commands to the script...
>
> Konstantin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Konstantinos Agouros 2001-04-18 13:20:37 Re: Yet another Performance Question
Previous Message DaVinci 2001-04-18 12:35:52 Re: Yet another Performance Question