Re: pgsql/doc/src/sgml admin.sgml advanced.sgml ar ...

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut - PostgreSQL <petere(at)hub(dot)org>, <pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgsql/doc/src/sgml admin.sgml advanced.sgml ar ...
Date: 2001-01-14 03:40:15
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.31.0101132338490.500-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

On Sat, 13 Jan 2001, Tom Lane wrote:

> The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> > On Sat, 13 Jan 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >>>> Log message:
> >>>> Terminology cleanup: class -> table, instance -> row, attribute -> column,
> >>>> etc.
> >>
> >> Yeeh.
>
> > sad, actually ... we try to be SQL complaint, yet we can't handle the
> > terminology? :(
>
> Eh? Table, row, column *are* the SQL terminology. The others are
> leftovers from PostQuel, and it's been a long time since we've used
> them consistently anyway.

Okay, then its definitely me confused here ... "The Practical SQL
Handbook", which I don' thave in front of me ... it doesn't refer to
things as table/row/column ... does it?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-01-14 03:43:26 Re: pgsql/doc/src/sgml admin.sgml advanced.sgml ar ...
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-01-14 03:36:55 Re: pgsql/doc/src/sgml admin.sgml advanced.sgml ar ...