Re: pgsql/doc/src/sgml admin.sgml advanced.sgml ar ...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut - PostgreSQL <petere(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql/doc/src/sgml admin.sgml advanced.sgml ar ...
Date: 2001-01-14 03:55:42
Message-ID: 9504.979444542@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
>> Eh? Table, row, column *are* the SQL terminology. The others are
>> leftovers from PostQuel, and it's been a long time since we've used
>> them consistently anyway.

> Okay, then its definitely me confused here ... "The Practical SQL
> Handbook", which I don' thave in front of me ... it doesn't refer to
> things as table/row/column ... does it?

I dunno about that book, but I do have the SQL spec in front of me,
and class/instance/attribute are not used in it. Table/row/column
are.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 2001-01-14 03:56:51 Re: pgsql/doc/src/sgml admin.sgml advanced.sgml ar ...
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 2001-01-14 03:50:13 Re: pgsql/doc/src/sgml admin.sgml advanced.sgml ar ...