Re: Snaptshot appears fine to me ...

From: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Snaptshot appears fine to me ...
Date: 2001-10-19 10:43:28
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.30.0110190641440.23852-100000@paprika.michvhf.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 15 Oct 2001, Tom Lane wrote:

> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> > Right now, from what I can tell, the snapshot looks great to me:
>
> That looks up-to-date to me too, but where did you get it from?
> The copy I pulled just now from
> ftp://ftp.us.postgresql.org/dev/postgresql-snapshot.tar.gz
> has still got the problem:

That should be ftp2.us.postgresql.org. But it should be irrelevant
very soon as I think we're ready to make the switchover now.

Vince.
--
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev(at)michvhf(dot)com http://www.pop4.net
56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking
Online Campground Directory http://www.camping-usa.com
Online Giftshop Superstore http://www.cloudninegifts.com
==========================================================================

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron de Jong 2001-10-19 11:22:38 Is there no "DESCRIBE <TABLE>;" on PGSQL? help!!!
Previous Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD 2001-10-19 10:04:39 Re: PQstatus() detect change in connection...