Re: (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes available.

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes available.
Date: 2000-12-11 22:21:29
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.21.0012111821120.25176-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net> writes:
> > > Basically Vadim left it up to me to campaign for acceptance of this
> > > work and he said he wouldn't have a problem bringing it in as long
> > > as it was ok with the rest of the development team.
> > > So can we get a go-ahead on this? :)
> >
> > If Vadim isn't sufficiently confident of it to commit it on his own
> > authority, I'm inclined to leave it out of 7.1. My concern is mostly
> > schedule. We are well into beta cycle now and this seems like way too
> > critical (not to say high-risk) a feature to be adding after start of
> > beta.
>
> I was wondering if Vadim was hesitant because he had done this under
> contract. Vadim, are you concerned about reliability or are there other
> issues?

Irrelevant .. we are post-beta release, and this doesn't fix a bug, so it
doesn't go in ...

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 2000-12-11 23:59:07 Re: Is VACUUM still crash-safe?
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-12-11 22:21:10 Re: (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes available.