Re: What's happening with pgsql-committers?

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: What's happening with pgsql-committers?
Date: 2000-10-08 01:13:02
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.21.0010072211360.1361-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Tom Lane wrote:

> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > Has anybody been getting pgsql-committers messages the last few days?
>
> Coming through fine for me (at least when hub.org isn't wedged
> completely, which it was several times over the weekend...)

We hit a corruption of -general again this past week (I've really gotta
dive into getting the postgresql backend working for majordomo instead of
Berkeley DB :( ) ... it was causing a perl process of 900+Meg to run,
which caused the load avg to climb unreasonably :(

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-10-08 01:16:19 Re: Autoconf version discrepancies
Previous Message Stephan Szabo 2000-10-08 00:43:20 Re: inheritance question 2/ref integrity