Re: Status of new relation file naming

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>, "'hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Status of new relation file naming
Date: 2000-09-12 20:59:56
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.21.0009121759150.1305-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> [ Charset KOI8-R unsupported, converting... ]
> > Where are we in subj?
> > Oid.version or UniqueId?
> > If noone is going to implement it soon then I'll have to
> > change code to OID file naming for WAL.
>
> Well, we can move to one of these, but we need tools so people can find
> the real table names that go with the files, and even then, it will
> never be as good as the system we currently have.

I thought it was generally agreed that this wasn't a requirement, and that
is someone felt it was required in the future, like any open source
project, they could ante up the time to build it ...

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-09-12 21:02:16 Re: Status of new relation file naming
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-09-12 20:14:00 Doesn't anyone around here run the regression tests on patches?