Re: Open Source Database Routs Competition in New BenchmarkTests

From: Jeff MacDonald <jeff(at)pgsql(dot)com>
To: Ned Lilly <ned(at)greatbridge(dot)com>
Cc: Matthew Kirkwood <weejock(at)ferret(dot)lmh(dot)ox(dot)ac(dot)uk>, merlin <merlin(at)sixdegrees(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Open Source Database Routs Competition in New BenchmarkTests
Date: 2000-08-16 02:47:01
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.21.0008152346292.594-100000@rage.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

this may be interesting ned.. and others..

http://www.devshed.com/BrainDump/MySQL_Benchmarks/

it will probably just fuel a fire. but at the same
time something can probably be learned.

jeff

On Tue, 15 Aug 2000, Ned Lilly wrote:

> Hi Matthew,
>
> We'll pull together some more background info on the specifics you
> mentioned, and put them on the website shortly.
>
> Regards,
> Ned
>
>
>
> Matthew Kirkwood wrote:
>
> > That said, it would be nice to see some actual
> > numbers and configurations for the postgresql end
> > of things; What hardware was used? What versions
> > of what system software? What OS tuning was done?
> > What parameters were supplied to postgres?
> >
> > Matthew.
>

Jeff MacDonald,

-----------------------------------------------------
PostgreSQL Inc | Hub.Org Networking Services
jeff(at)pgsql(dot)com | jeff(at)hub(dot)org
www.pgsql.com | www.hub.org
1-902-542-0713 | 1-902-542-3657
-----------------------------------------------------
Fascimile : 1 902 542 5386
IRC Nick : bignose

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Don Baccus 2000-08-16 03:39:36 Re: Open Source Database Routs Competition in New BenchmarkTests
Previous Message George Robinson II 2000-08-16 02:28:43 Referential integrity

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ryan Kirkpatrick 2000-08-16 02:49:55 Re: [HACKERS] Linux/Alpha Regression Test Patch
Previous Message Jeff MacDonald 2000-08-16 02:46:20 Re: Security choices...