From: | Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: crypt and MD5 - still not wanted |
Date: | 2000-07-07 18:26:41 |
Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.21.0007071426270.81653-100000@paprika.michvhf.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 7 Jul 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
> If I recall the prior discussion, MD5 is OK, crypt is still risky,
> because MD5 is not an encryption algorithm so it doesn't fall under
> the US export laws.
>
> I believe Vince V. is working on improving the password challenge
> code to use MD5, btw.
yep.
Vince.
--
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev(at)michvhf(dot)com http://www.pop4.net
128K ISDN from $22.00/mo - 56K Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking
Online Campground Directory http://www.camping-usa.com
Online Giftshop Superstore http://www.cloudninegifts.com
==========================================================================
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-07-07 18:51:26 | Is this useful |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-07-07 18:23:45 | Re: crypt and MD5 - still not wanted |