Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Rolf Grossmann <grossman(at)securitas(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0
Date: 2000-02-24 23:05:49
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.21.0002241904550.81087-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > > Perhaps this is a good time to ask when and how any fix to this should be
> > > applied.
> >
> > This is arguably a bug fix, so you needn't worry about it being beta
> > phase.
>
> I'm not sure how this works now: Do I just commit it to the tree, so it
> will be in when, say, beta2 gets generated?

bug fixes, yes ... but posting a patch against the current beta1 as a sort
of "here's the fix" would be very appreciated.

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-02-24 23:39:03 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-02-24 23:04:18 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-02-24 23:38:47 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Patch for more readable parse error messages
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-02-24 23:04:18 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0