Re: [HACKERS] New version number 6.6 or 7.0

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New version number 6.6 or 7.0
Date: 1999-07-19 14:05:29
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.05.9907191104150.64002-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, 17 Jul 1999, Thomas Lockhart wrote:

> > Can I have votes on what people want the next version number to be?
> > We have to brand the release when we start development(PG_VERSION
> > file). 6.5 probably should have been called 7.0, but we had already
> > committed to 6.5.
>
> We've been making pretty steady progress over the last few releases.
> I'd suggest that a bump to 7.0 should happen when we've accumulated
> most of the fixes/improvements from the "hot list". We've worked
> through most of those; here are the ones I'd like to see at or before
> a 7.0 release:
>
> o implement outer joins
> o merge date/time types and deprecate the old 4-byte ones

My opinion is that MVCC should have jump'd us to 7.0 in the first
place...

IMHO, release for October should be v7.0 ... if the above two get done,
great, if not, no probs...

Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 1999-07-19 14:14:40 Re: [HACKERS] CVS
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 1999-07-19 14:03:18 RE: [HACKERS] CVS