| From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Integration <abrams(at)philos(dot)umass(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.x |
| Date: | 1998-11-25 14:13:41 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.05.9811251012510.9762-100000@thelab.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 25 Nov 1998, Integration wrote:
> I apologize. pgsql-questions has disappeared? (out of the loop, I am)
>
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > My questions are:
> > (1) does 6.4 offer speed improvements over 6.3.2?
Yes...
> > (2) does 6.4 offer stability improvements over 6.3.2?
Yes...
> > (3) does 6.4 support query lengths > 8192, or data blocks > 8192
> (other than large objects)?
Not yet, but Bruce has/had some ideas for v6.5 for doing this
using a row-spanning method...theory sounded great :)
Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas G. Lockhart | 1998-11-25 14:19:53 | Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.x |
| Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 1998-11-25 14:12:38 | Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.x |