| From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Gould <dg(at)illustra(dot)com> |
| Cc: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Current sources? |
| Date: | 1998-05-31 18:42:46 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.3.96.980531154233.336T-100000@thelab.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, 31 May 1998, David Gould wrote:
> > On Sun, 31 May 1998, David Gould wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks. One question, is there any reason we can't use the intx tests on
> > > all the platforms? I realize that float it another set of problems, but it
> > > seems that int should be be the same?
> >
> > 10c10
> > < ERROR: pg_atoi: error reading "100000": Result too large
> > ---
> > > ERROR: pg_atoi: error reading "100000": Math result not representable
> >
> > The changes are more error message relatd then anything...
> >
> > Marc G. Fournier
> > Systems Administrator @ hub.org
> > primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org
>
> Thats what I thought. So can we just rename the int*-*BSD.out to int*.out?
No cause then that will break the Linux regression tests :)
Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas G. Lockhart | 1998-05-31 19:01:07 | Re: [HACKERS] Current sources? |
| Previous Message | David Gould | 1998-05-31 18:36:27 | Re: [HACKERS] Current sources? |