Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] ecpg patch

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)topsystem(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] ecpg patch
Date: 1998-04-17 01:22:50
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.3.96.980416222152.333F-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 16 Apr 1998, Thomas G. Lockhart wrote:

> > P.S.: Yes, I'm back from vacation. :-)
>
> Michael, would you have time to look at Tom Good's reported problems
> with v6.3.1 ecpg? We have a few days to make changes if necessary...
>
> Marc, I'd like to make sure that we haven't broken too much in the
> Makefiles since v6.3.1. I'll try patching the docs makefile (how did we
> get _two_ versions with breakage? tsk tsk :)

I'm grabbing a current copy right now and will run through it all
under FreeBSD...will do a quick run through under Solaris tomorrow
morning.

Unless any problem reports between now and 4:30, whatever is in
the snapshot tomorrow morning will be what is called v6.3.2 ... any
problems reported will offset that by *one* day...

Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 1998-04-17 01:25:14 Re: [HACKERS] Status of 6.3.2 snapshot on alpha/Digital Unix
Previous Message Michal Mosiewicz 1998-04-17 00:22:58 fsync -> fdatasync in backend/storage/file/fd.c