Re: elog.c comiple problem on AIX 4.2.1

From: Samuel A Horwitz <horwitz(at)argoscomp(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: elog.c comiple problem on AIX 4.2.1
Date: 2003-09-03 13:54:34
Message-ID: Pine.A41.4.21.0309030954280.54364-100000@argos
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

YES it seems.

On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Tom Lane wrote:

> Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2003 13:34:09 -0400
> From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
> To: Samuel A Horwitz <horwitz(at)argoscomp(dot)com>
> Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] elog.c comiple problem on AIX 4.2.1
>
> Samuel A Horwitz <horwitz(at)argoscomp(dot)com> writes:
> > c/include -I/usr/local/ssl/include -c -o elog.o elog.c
> > elog.c: In function `errcode_for_file_access':
> > elog.c:546: duplicate case value
> > elog.c:539: previously used here
> > gmake[4]: *** [elog.o] Error 1
>
> [ scratches head ... ] EEXIST and ENOTEMPTY are the same code on your
> machine?
>
> regards, tom lane
>

horwitz(at)argoscomp(dot)com (Samuel A Horwitz)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-09-03 14:13:45 Re: Using oids
Previous Message Oliver Elphick 2003-09-03 13:03:55 Re: Using oids