RE: Re[2]: [Please vote for postgresql!!!]

From: "R(dot)Munden" <orbitmaster(at)netorbit(dot)com>
To: "Bruno Dickhoff" <bruno(at)dickhoff(dot)de>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [Please vote for postgresql!!!]
Date: 2000-12-03 22:14:48
Message-ID: NDBBLMNJCLEHDNNGEDMOOEBBEEAA.orbitmaster@netorbit.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

looks like it backfired...they've reset the graph

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Bruno Dickhoff
> Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2000 3:11 PM
> To: Bill Barnes
> Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re[2]: [[GENERAL] Please vote for postgresql!!!]
>
>
> Hello Bill,
> Sunday, December 03, 2000, 9:18:12 PM, you wrote:
>
> BB> Thanks for the tip. Looked good enough to sign up for an account.
> BB> The numbers I saw gave postgesql a significant lead.
>
> So, my appeal for voting did it's job! Before I posted the mail,
> mysql was leading at
> 1200 to 450 (and 430 for interbase). Now it is 1461 for pgsql,
> 1.254 for mysql
> and 432 for interbase...
>
> I hope all of us will frequently take a look at
http://www.mycgiserver.com so
things won't get turned upside down again ;-)).

--
Best regards,
Bruno mailto:bruno(at)dickhoff(dot)de

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2000-12-03 22:41:14 Re: Unanswered questions about Postgre
Previous Message Bruno Dickhoff 2000-12-03 21:10:40 Re[2]: [Please vote for postgresql!!!]