Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit hashjoins

From: Erik Riedel <riedel+(at)CMU(dot)EDU>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit hashjoins
Date: 1999-05-17 13:14:35
Message-ID: MrE1MvW00gNt81tBp8@andrew.cmu.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Excerpts from mail: 10-May-99 Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit hashjo.. by Tom
Lane(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
> I believe this is fixed, but it'd be nice to have some confirmation from
> someone with a platform where long != int ... Erik, have you tried it
> recently?
>
Sorry for the slow response.

I tried this when the fix was first done, and I thought I reported to
the list that it worked fine.

I actually have not updated my tree since then, so I don't know about
changes after 25 March. My logs say:

630 snapshot from postgresql CVS (25 March 1999)
631 fix for 64-bit LONGALIGN (works!)

I have been using that version since March without problems (well, at
least no problems with 64-bit ints and hashjoins...).

Erik

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message secret 1999-05-17 13:14:50 Re: [SQL] Oddities with NULL and GROUP BY
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 1999-05-17 09:50:42 RE: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items