From: | Erik Riedel <riedel+(at)CMU(dot)EDU> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit hashjoins |
Date: | 1999-05-17 13:14:35 |
Message-ID: | MrE1MvW00gNt81tBp8@andrew.cmu.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from mail: 10-May-99 Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit hashjo.. by Tom
Lane(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
> I believe this is fixed, but it'd be nice to have some confirmation from
> someone with a platform where long != int ... Erik, have you tried it
> recently?
>
Sorry for the slow response.
I tried this when the fix was first done, and I thought I reported to
the list that it worked fine.
I actually have not updated my tree since then, so I don't know about
changes after 25 March. My logs say:
630 snapshot from postgresql CVS (25 March 1999)
631 fix for 64-bit LONGALIGN (works!)
I have been using that version since March without problems (well, at
least no problems with 64-bit ints and hashjoins...).
Erik
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | secret | 1999-05-17 13:14:50 | Re: [SQL] Oddities with NULL and GROUP BY |
Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 1999-05-17 09:50:42 | RE: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items |