Re: anonymous composite types for Table Functions (aka

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Joe Conway" <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: anonymous composite types for Table Functions (aka
Date: 2002-08-05 04:09:49
Message-ID: GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOOEIACDAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

> test=# select * from myfoo2() as (a int8, b text, c text, d text, e text);
> ERROR: Query-specified return tuple and actual function return tuple do
> not match

I wonder if that would read a little better (and perhaps be in the active
voice) if it was like below. The word 'actual' seems a little casual, and
do people really know what tuples are?

ERROR: Query-specified function result alias does not match defined function
result type.

Chris

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2002-08-05 04:19:22 Re: anonymous composite types for Table Functions (aka
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-08-05 04:08:33 Re: anonymous composite types for Table Functions (aka SRFs)

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2002-08-05 04:19:22 Re: anonymous composite types for Table Functions (aka
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-08-05 04:08:33 Re: anonymous composite types for Table Functions (aka SRFs)