| From: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Prepared statements question |
| Date: | 2003-01-10 04:02:40 |
| Message-ID: | GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOGEPFCEAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I guess I should just use a stored procedure...
Chris
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Christopher
> Kings-Lynne
> Sent: Friday, 10 January 2003 11:48 AM
> To: Hackers
> Subject: [HACKERS] Prepared statements question
>
>
> Hi,
>
> With prepared statements being all well and good, how do I know
> if the query
> has not yet been prepared in the backend? Or is this simply a situation
> where I can't win?
>
> eg. Say I have a web page that does a humungous query. I would
> like to have
> that query prepared, say, for speed. However, I can't tell if
> that backend
> has had that query prepared or not. Is there any way around this?
>
> Chris
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2003-01-10 04:50:41 | Re: Prepared statements question |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-01-10 03:48:28 | Prepared statements question |