From: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | "David BOURIAUD" <david(dot)bouriaud(at)ac-rouen(dot)fr>, <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: About referential integrity. |
Date: | 2002-02-26 08:02:58 |
Message-ID: | GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOEEIPCBAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
> Anyway, couldn't it be an extention to postgreSQL ? If you have
> heard about
> Business Objects, you should know that it can do it very well
> provided you
> draw the relationchips between the tables of your database. And
> it's of much
> use, since you just have to concentrate on the fields you want to
> fetch and
> the program takes care of the relations and handles group by,
> order by and
> where clause.
Nope - that's the job of the client program (ie. Business Objects)
> As of PostgreSQL, I don't think it would be a hard thing to put
> on, since the
> relations are stored in a system table, including the fields the
> tables are
> linked by. A sort of syntax :
>
> select *
> from AUTO JOIN t1, t2;
How is this different from:
select *
from t1 NATURAL JOIN t2;
???
Chris
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bradley Baetz | 2002-02-26 08:09:55 | Re: [SQL] query optimistaion problems |
Previous Message | Erle Czar Mantos | 2002-02-26 07:53:02 | Re: On delete cascade! |