Re: About referential integrity.

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "David BOURIAUD" <david(dot)bouriaud(at)ac-rouen(dot)fr>, <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: About referential integrity.
Date: 2002-02-26 08:02:58
Message-ID: GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOEEIPCBAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

> Anyway, couldn't it be an extention to postgreSQL ? If you have
> heard about
> Business Objects, you should know that it can do it very well
> provided you
> draw the relationchips between the tables of your database. And
> it's of much
> use, since you just have to concentrate on the fields you want to
> fetch and
> the program takes care of the relations and handles group by,
> order by and
> where clause.

Nope - that's the job of the client program (ie. Business Objects)

> As of PostgreSQL, I don't think it would be a hard thing to put
> on, since the
> relations are stored in a system table, including the fields the
> tables are
> linked by. A sort of syntax :
>
> select *
> from AUTO JOIN t1, t2;

How is this different from:

select *
from t1 NATURAL JOIN t2;

???

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bradley Baetz 2002-02-26 08:09:55 Re: [SQL] query optimistaion problems
Previous Message Erle Czar Mantos 2002-02-26 07:53:02 Re: On delete cascade!