From: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | "Tatsuo Ishii" <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz> |
Cc: | <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: getpid() function |
Date: | 2002-08-02 08:50:13 |
Message-ID: | GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOEEHOCDAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
> > For example convert(), all datetype function like int(). The name
> > convenition must be like names in group 1/
>
> FYI, I have been proposing SQL99 compatible convert(). I would like to
> add it if no one objects.
No objection, but what does it do out of interest? Will it cause a
backwards compatibility problem at all?
Chris
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Yaroslav Dmitriev | 2002-08-02 08:59:19 | []performance issues |
Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2002-08-02 08:38:37 | Re: getpid() function |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Yaroslav Dmitriev | 2002-08-02 08:59:19 | []performance issues |
Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2002-08-02 08:38:37 | Re: getpid() function |